Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-02 21:12:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0DBA64F324DF9433A838FD0245B5D7811B0E167EF4C9F66F83A63B2739F59D83
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note contradicts itself. It first denies a pre/post-surgery comparison but then confirms comparing individuals who had and had not undergone surgery. This suggests the study does assess post-surgery outcomes, undermining the claim it doesn't. What the FUCK!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1896287764506886289
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0DBA64F324DF9433A838FD0245B5D7811B0E167EF4C9F66F83A63B2739F59D83
  • createdAtMillis - 1740949979584
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18962877645068862890DBA64F324DF9433A838FD0245B5D7811B0E167EF4C9F66F83A63B2739F59D83