Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-02 12:42:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A693C4E421085DEDB60F072E924606899DEF1C1B39CEC95127FF229319D0B2AC
Participant Details

Original Note:

This was not consulting, this was research that supports the US fishing industry. Consulting was the incorrect label applied by DOGE. This type of sampling reduced monitoring costs https://academic.oup.com/najfm/article/35/2/241/7827277

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1895972316028551264
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A693C4E421085DEDB60F072E924606899DEF1C1B39CEC95127FF229319D0B2AC
  • createdAtMillis - 1740919322132
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1895972316028551264A693C4E421085DEDB60F072E924606899DEF1C1B39CEC95127FF229319D0B2AC