Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-03 01:54:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17D2FE18F3A701C89C062376D31C2550DFE146F2A7C5E5855D78180EAC0ACD49
Participant Details

Original Note:

This was not consulting, this was research that supports the US fishing industry. Consulting was the incorrect label applied by DOGE. This type of sampling reduced monitoring costs https://academic.oup.com/najfm/article/35/2/241/7827277

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1895972316028551264
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 17D2FE18F3A701C89C062376D31C2550DFE146F2A7C5E5855D78180EAC0ACD49
  • createdAtMillis - 1740966846063
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 189597231602855126417D2FE18F3A701C89C062376D31C2550DFE146F2A7C5E5855D78180EAC0ACD49