Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-28 07:15:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AFCB2D2CD629CE84C0A08AE3922DFDBAAB6167CAD25C4EBCB1A44312FBE54A8E
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence that The New York Times only added the journalists' names in response to the original tweet. The earliest archived version of the stories on the Internet Archive contains the journalists' names. https://web.archive.org/web/20250227123648/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/02/27/us/politics/doge-staff-list.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1895155919438434517
participantId -
raterParticipantId - AFCB2D2CD629CE84C0A08AE3922DFDBAAB6167CAD25C4EBCB1A44312FBE54A8E
createdAtMillis - 1740726953114
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1895155919438434517AFCB2D2CD629CE84C0A08AE3922DFDBAAB6167CAD25C4EBCB1A44312FBE54A8E