Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-27 21:00:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F128191C21391979123389D96241F48821D6F91C49B2B5EAAA571BF87CE12E86
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note asserts the post's claim and about NGO isn't evidence. It is evidence, its credibility is unknown currently. Generally proof is determined by multiple pieces of evidence. Note implies one piece of evidence must prove claim. Dishonest note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1895137942332457281
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F128191C21391979123389D96241F48821D6F91C49B2B5EAAA571BF87CE12E86
  • createdAtMillis - 1740690037597
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1895137942332457281F128191C21391979123389D96241F48821D6F91C49B2B5EAAA571BF87CE12E86