Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-28 01:50:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CFE873485FCBBF897816AD7595D81216AF5210CE10BF6C9D5BD223B402A9A46B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note asserts the post's claim and about NGO isn't evidence. It is evidence, its credibility is unknown currently. Generally proof is determined by multiple pieces of evidence. Note implies one piece of evidence must prove claim. Dishonest note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1895137942332457281
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CFE873485FCBBF897816AD7595D81216AF5210CE10BF6C9D5BD223B402A9A46B
  • createdAtMillis - 1740707407525
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1895137942332457281CFE873485FCBBF897816AD7595D81216AF5210CE10BF6C9D5BD223B402A9A46B