Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-27 21:31:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C5AEF48FC76B7041AD4873B245736A6B8D9C41E7D79339E3BF701B7343D4EE60
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note asserts the post's claim and about NGO isn't evidence. It is evidence, its credibility is unknown currently. Generally proof is determined by multiple pieces of evidence. Note implies one piece of evidence must prove claim. Dishonest note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1895137942332457281
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C5AEF48FC76B7041AD4873B245736A6B8D9C41E7D79339E3BF701B7343D4EE60
  • createdAtMillis - 1740691917898
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1895137942332457281C5AEF48FC76B7041AD4873B245736A6B8D9C41E7D79339E3BF701B7343D4EE60