Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-27 19:26:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2DB61BFD971B9D0A8519A98D0AD8156E4BD55595C8B759A1A367F0CAB86DCD23
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note asserts the post's claim and about NGO isn't evidence. It is evidence, its credibility is unknown currently. Generally proof is determined by multiple pieces of evidence. Note implies one piece of evidence must prove claim. Dishonest note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1895137942332457281
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2DB61BFD971B9D0A8519A98D0AD8156E4BD55595C8B759A1A367F0CAB86DCD23
  • createdAtMillis - 1740684363265
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18951379423324572812DB61BFD971B9D0A8519A98D0AD8156E4BD55595C8B759A1A367F0CAB86DCD23