Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-28 04:39:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 01F87ADBFD1BB75EBB6B752CE2A66E6E20002E1BDBF0DA2586270221E412816E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note asserts the post's claim and about NGO isn't evidence. It is evidence, its credibility is unknown currently. Generally proof is determined by multiple pieces of evidence. Note implies one piece of evidence must prove claim. Dishonest note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1895137942332457281
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 01F87ADBFD1BB75EBB6B752CE2A66E6E20002E1BDBF0DA2586270221E412816E
  • createdAtMillis - 1740717545218
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 189513794233245728101F87ADBFD1BB75EBB6B752CE2A66E6E20002E1BDBF0DA2586270221E412816E