Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-27 20:34:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F835DDDD6FB4FFE3B2DAA2DD5E5A362AA8AFD3E62D99922A3A8463F224A86ED5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN : The first note by enterprising desert raven references a different case than the ones being discussed in the OP. The statement in the OP is accurate. https://ctmirror.org/2025/02/21/2023-bridgeport-primary-election-charges/ https://www.inquirer.com/politics/election/millbourne-officials-election-conspiracy-charges-20250220.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1895136997234168176
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F835DDDD6FB4FFE3B2DAA2DD5E5A362AA8AFD3E62D99922A3A8463F224A86ED5
  • createdAtMillis - 1740688470953
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1895136997234168176F835DDDD6FB4FFE3B2DAA2DD5E5A362AA8AFD3E62D99922A3A8463F224A86ED5