Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-27 15:40:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 56E34046850408D2C81B6D64F00EAEA9FC28C4B16D3B4517325059E72BE578C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

O tweet distorce a matéria. A reportagem explica que o STF interpretou o artigo 11 do Marco Civil. É prerrogativa constitucional do STF interpretar leis. A lei, portanto, já existia e não foi criada pelo Xandão. https://www.aosfatos.org/noticias/marco-civil-exige-que-plataforma-estrangeira-respeite-lei-brasileira/ https://portal.stf.jus.br/jurisprudencia/tesauro/pesquisa.asp?pesquisaLivre=INTERPRETA%C3%87%C3%83O#:~:text=%C3%89%20aquela%20em%20que%20o,interpretada%20todas%20as%20suas%20consequ%C3%AAncias.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1895132336728969558
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 56E34046850408D2C81B6D64F00EAEA9FC28C4B16D3B4517325059E72BE578C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1740670803981
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 189513233672896955856E34046850408D2C81B6D64F00EAEA9FC28C4B16D3B4517325059E72BE578C2