Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-26 23:04:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D7A497649F5D8364A67CA6A3C44F524A6F26310DFB38BC4B99B51867E2E46760
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. This is an opinion. Also, there are many arguments for this opinion that have absolutely nothing to do with saving taxpayer money, so the proposed notes are entirely irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1894781122740912159
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D7A497649F5D8364A67CA6A3C44F524A6F26310DFB38BC4B99B51867E2E46760
  • createdAtMillis - 1740611069811
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1894781122740912159D7A497649F5D8364A67CA6A3C44F524A6F26310DFB38BC4B99B51867E2E46760