Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-26 13:07:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9046504B268C7C2426B014A82C30230D62D0881E44E50C1C079F4F52759A50E1
Participant Details

Original Note:

La explicación no es correcta o deliberadamente falsa (argumentario) Siguiendo su ejemplo, la supuesta hipoteca condonada se reparte entre el resto de ciudadanos, tengan hipoteca o no. No es un tema de cainismo sino de negarse a que ciertas CCAA sigan quemando dinero público. https://x.com/Jongonzlz/status/1894425093037600952

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1894677112055062572
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9046504B268C7C2426B014A82C30230D62D0881E44E50C1C079F4F52759A50E1
  • createdAtMillis - 1740575263112
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18946771120550625729046504B268C7C2426B014A82C30230D62D0881E44E50C1C079F4F52759A50E1