Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-27 20:43:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39133FE5C6A6103300F70792F0353915580439F8B9EF059BD1A70421C771E612
Participant Details

Original Note:

La explicación no es correcta o deliberadamente falsa (argumentario) Siguiendo su ejemplo, la supuesta hipoteca condonada se reparte entre el resto de ciudadanos, tengan hipoteca o no. No es un tema de cainismo sino de negarse a que ciertas CCAA sigan quemando dinero público. https://x.com/Jongonzlz/status/1894425093037600952

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1894677112055062572
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39133FE5C6A6103300F70792F0353915580439F8B9EF059BD1A70421C771E612
  • createdAtMillis - 1740688987500
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 189467711205506257239133FE5C6A6103300F70792F0353915580439F8B9EF059BD1A70421C771E612