Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-26 21:50:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED91CDF44122AF8094458F0C2D3ACF9B3CB8A40AA7E1ECF9AAE0375EED3059B2
Participant Details

Original Note:

This statement relies on oversimplification and emotional rhetoric rather than an accurate depiction of the U.S. legal system. Judicial checks on executive power are a hallmark of democracy, not tyranny. https://www.britannica.com/topic/checks-and-balances https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-marbury-madison-trump-musk-constitution-81281e29b46b409984dc5a2e0cf7a06c https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/5/137/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1894638541743046804
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED91CDF44122AF8094458F0C2D3ACF9B3CB8A40AA7E1ECF9AAE0375EED3059B2
  • createdAtMillis - 1740606658930
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1894638541743046804ED91CDF44122AF8094458F0C2D3ACF9B3CB8A40AA7E1ECF9AAE0375EED3059B2