Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-26 11:35:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B650C82EC0C7A5F68B7EC05C3D02FDA8660499E653A36E157A67B73B8F5988F2
Participant Details

Original Note:

This statement relies on oversimplification and emotional rhetoric rather than an accurate depiction of the U.S. legal system. Judicial checks on executive power are a hallmark of democracy, not tyranny. https://www.britannica.com/topic/checks-and-balances https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-marbury-madison-trump-musk-constitution-81281e29b46b409984dc5a2e0cf7a06c https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/5/137/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1894638541743046804
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B650C82EC0C7A5F68B7EC05C3D02FDA8660499E653A36E157A67B73B8F5988F2
  • createdAtMillis - 1740569728728
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1894638541743046804B650C82EC0C7A5F68B7EC05C3D02FDA8660499E653A36E157A67B73B8F5988F2