Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-26 07:20:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7938FFDCF4F15D72CE7B24D021F545F3056D3D3E357666829378671FF1E10FF3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le rassemblement national avait certe alerté mais n'a pas voté la censure et a donc accepté alors que rien ne lui obligeait l'article 4 https://lcp.fr/actualites/les-motions-de-censure-defendues-par-lfi-rejetees-le-budget-2025-adopte-a-l-assemblee

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1894624153509978436
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7938FFDCF4F15D72CE7B24D021F545F3056D3D3E357666829378671FF1E10FF3
  • createdAtMillis - 1740554434935
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18946241535099784367938FFDCF4F15D72CE7B24D021F545F3056D3D3E357666829378671FF1E10FF3