Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-24 00:36:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F4CE54A7CF4F235F616E26132BE7BADCC984119AEF7FE4D54B45DE0A12880E05
Participant Details

Original Note:

O post do @SLBenfica contém um erro factual e informações desatualizadas que podem ser enganosas, ao afirmar que o primeiro golo é inválido. O post apresenta uma deturpação, ignorando um contexto importante: com recurso à tecnologia VAR, provou-se que não houve irregularidades https://www.abola.pt/futebol/noticias/sporting-foi-esta-a-imagem-que-validou-o-golo-de-diomande-2025022320511464615

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1893782451358462116
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F4CE54A7CF4F235F616E26132BE7BADCC984119AEF7FE4D54B45DE0A12880E05
  • createdAtMillis - 1740357397504
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1893782451358462116F4CE54A7CF4F235F616E26132BE7BADCC984119AEF7FE4D54B45DE0A12880E05