Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-23 22:29:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 55E4E4C8A25E57958CC54FC1C02CFE844B3D7DDCE8BE9AB1DE4586E3C4C5C0BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379v1.full-text

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1893620328255164846
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 55E4E4C8A25E57958CC54FC1C02CFE844B3D7DDCE8BE9AB1DE4586E3C4C5C0BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1740349750705
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 189362032825516484655E4E4C8A25E57958CC54FC1C02CFE844B3D7DDCE8BE9AB1DE4586E3C4C5C0BE