Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-22 16:04:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1299732836B66B15983E965B70C1A0040FA1CF33416EB1C9A1F62CBA431E9116
Participant Details

Original Note:

The headline is misleading, spiking is already covered by various criminal offences because it encompasses different types of act. There is a different question as to whether it would be helpful to have a specific offence of spiking. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cdp-2023-0231/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1893328201876996339
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1299732836B66B15983E965B70C1A0040FA1CF33416EB1C9A1F62CBA431E9116
  • createdAtMillis - 1740240288941
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18933282018769963391299732836B66B15983E965B70C1A0040FA1CF33416EB1C9A1F62CBA431E9116