Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-22 16:02:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D3E834E8EAFD441290133D0F20FA6DC5AE0988BDEDADBCB007EF989C1774D48C
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'audimat est bien supérieur, certes. Toutefois le post omet certains éléments importants à prendre en compte : Quotidien rediffuse une émission enregistrée auparavant. Cette omission rend le post biaisé, indiquant donc une opinion personnelle. Enfin,le post est bien trompeur. https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omission_(droit)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1893302251013190120
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D3E834E8EAFD441290133D0F20FA6DC5AE0988BDEDADBCB007EF989C1774D48C
  • createdAtMillis - 1740240161516
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1893302251013190120D3E834E8EAFD441290133D0F20FA6DC5AE0988BDEDADBCB007EF989C1774D48C