Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-22 16:32:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B4B85F23EF1188A4F8F4870BFFBD6CF7DBE8134F992C28EE89BFD312C3803B81
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'audimat est bien supérieur, certes. Toutefois le post omet certains éléments importants à prendre en compte : Quotidien rediffuse une émission enregistrée auparavant. Cette omission rend le post biaisé, indiquant donc une opinion personnelle. Enfin,le post est bien trompeur. https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omission_(droit)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1893302251013190120
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B4B85F23EF1188A4F8F4870BFFBD6CF7DBE8134F992C28EE89BFD312C3803B81
  • createdAtMillis - 1740241945049
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1893302251013190120B4B85F23EF1188A4F8F4870BFFBD6CF7DBE8134F992C28EE89BFD312C3803B81