Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-23 00:26:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6F20D60A8BE04FD1FE2B81FBC5C81C5427AE17883F73220C11B660F8F4B1971D
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'audimat est bien supérieur, certes. Toutefois le post omet certains éléments importants à prendre en compte : Quotidien rediffuse une émission enregistrée auparavant. Cette omission rend le post biaisé, indiquant donc une opinion personnelle. Enfin,le post est bien trompeur. https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omission_(droit)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1893302251013190120
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6F20D60A8BE04FD1FE2B81FBC5C81C5427AE17883F73220C11B660F8F4B1971D
  • createdAtMillis - 1740270405470
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18933022510131901206F20D60A8BE04FD1FE2B81FBC5C81C5427AE17883F73220C11B660F8F4B1971D