Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-23 10:28:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17C52AB2106D7A44DB9EC5BFC4910E47D56C48FA366AE281536E4BBF98BF8A58
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'audimat est bien supérieur, certes. Toutefois le post omet certains éléments importants à prendre en compte : Quotidien rediffuse une émission enregistrée auparavant. Cette omission rend le post biaisé, indiquant donc une opinion personnelle. Enfin,le post est bien trompeur. https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omission_(droit)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1893302251013190120
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 17C52AB2106D7A44DB9EC5BFC4910E47D56C48FA366AE281536E4BBF98BF8A58
createdAtMillis - 1740306521767
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 189330225101319012017C52AB2106D7A44DB9EC5BFC4910E47D56C48FA366AE281536E4BBF98BF8A58