Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-02-22 16:51:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4839CE65FD3B8AD52F28B1EF27DC439273AEF7C1A3A3CD85B4D57E9A7F215AC9
Participant Details
Original Note:
Kristen Meghan’s allegations, while emotionally compelling, collapse under scientific scrutiny. The absence of physical evidence, coupled with her disputed expertise & reliance on debunked sources, undermines her credibility: https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/critical-thinking-environment/trail-chemtrail-nonsense https://www.newscientist.com/article/2101611-chemtrails-conspiracy-theory-gets-put-to-the-ultimate-test/ https://www.cnn.com/us/chemtrails-conspiracy-theory-explained-cec/index.html Chemtrail Claims & Evidentiary Gaps: https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/chemtrails-conspiracy-theory https://www.metabunk.org/threads/kristen-meghan-former-us-air-force-whistle-blower.1066/ https://www.metabunk.org/threads/jim-babb-kristen-meghan-chemtrails-debate-at-porcfest.3889/ https://www.metabunk.org/threads/jim-babb-kristen-meghan-chemtrails-debate-at-porcfest.3889/page-2 https://scitechdaily.com/the-unintended-consequences-of-geoengineering-a-cooler-atmosphere/ https://casetext.com/case/kelly-v-the-daily-beast-co
All Note Details