Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-21 01:02:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 725E11FDB4032C15F2C9BFE279B997AFD79A161781A18EFF52F857DB5A803032
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The actual letter is posted in the OP. It is not unreasonable to read the claims in the letter as pretextual and it being the result of criticism. If you disagree, take it to the comments. Proposed note adds nothing that wasn’t in OP.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1892732781702131757
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 725E11FDB4032C15F2C9BFE279B997AFD79A161781A18EFF52F857DB5A803032
  • createdAtMillis - 1740099726843
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1892732781702131757725E11FDB4032C15F2C9BFE279B997AFD79A161781A18EFF52F857DB5A803032