Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-21 22:22:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5D275857A775AB8F69CCF5AFE425907CA628F1A44D8C819B674F3A79A8B1B82A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The actual letter is posted in the OP. It is not unreasonable to read the claims in the letter as pretextual and it being the result of criticism. If you disagree, take it to the comments. Proposed note adds nothing that wasn’t in OP.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1892732781702131757
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5D275857A775AB8F69CCF5AFE425907CA628F1A44D8C819B674F3A79A8B1B82A
  • createdAtMillis - 1740176542462
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18927327817021317575D275857A775AB8F69CCF5AFE425907CA628F1A44D8C819B674F3A79A8B1B82A