Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-21 15:30:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 34E5E32139834AFFF9DCA5CF0390209161D8FA9409444FE8D5947C627F0FCE0A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The actual letter is posted in the OP. It is not unreasonable to read the claims in the letter as pretextual and it being the result of criticism. If you disagree, take it to the comments. Proposed note adds nothing that wasn’t in OP.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1892732781702131757
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 34E5E32139834AFFF9DCA5CF0390209161D8FA9409444FE8D5947C627F0FCE0A
  • createdAtMillis - 1740151804908
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 189273278170213175734E5E32139834AFFF9DCA5CF0390209161D8FA9409444FE8D5947C627F0FCE0A