Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-20 17:48:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E3D9974322B37C9081862A4473180006E1ABD31714139A1B892AEA928B0D2B2
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is inaccurate and misleading. The OP contradicts himself in the first 2 sentences, saying there were no bans, then immediately flips and says there was bans but makes excuses for it. The fact of the matter is, there were bans. A in depth explanation of the bans: https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/1892619147856511297?t=_-pCGxDlqWJhMYGsLxvFuA&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1892629096019959868
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E3D9974322B37C9081862A4473180006E1ABD31714139A1B892AEA928B0D2B2
  • createdAtMillis - 1740073735679
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18926290960199598685E3D9974322B37C9081862A4473180006E1ABD31714139A1B892AEA928B0D2B2