Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-21 11:56:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 709BEC4CEC18070B6D7C9485CF7F51828D90137197D24CF140352F62B17E2A41
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note needed. Proposed NNN is just speculation, and uses a Daily Mail link (unreliable). https://adfontesmedia.com/daily-mail-bias-and-reliability/ https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1892263476732797219
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 709BEC4CEC18070B6D7C9485CF7F51828D90137197D24CF140352F62B17E2A41
  • createdAtMillis - 1740138963652
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1892263476732797219709BEC4CEC18070B6D7C9485CF7F51828D90137197D24CF140352F62B17E2A41