Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-19 23:54:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA2BB22BA1B40CCD0E3F58A88E77794E60EABDD6E329CC10E6A3E8B0549CBFBB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Limitations: "While we used two independent approaches to ascertain previous infection with SARS-CoV-2, negative results cannot definitively preclude prior infection that occurred in the distant past." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379v1.full.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1892242431283736610
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA2BB22BA1B40CCD0E3F58A88E77794E60EABDD6E329CC10E6A3E8B0549CBFBB
  • createdAtMillis - 1740009268593
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1892242431283736610CA2BB22BA1B40CCD0E3F58A88E77794E60EABDD6E329CC10E6A3E8B0549CBFBB