Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-18 12:31:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 43E37657DCEF3F16C27FE28790FFE9A49E1EBD67E945F7EF8E5B04B669BD5610
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post is highly misleading. The table includes many SS numbers of non-recipients. When the query is done properly, the apparent problem disappears. Readers are likely to be mislead into thinking that the problematic numbers represent fraud. https://x.com/justinwolfers/status/1891678450487841007?s=46&t=JdH7Whg52JprOtD97_U79g

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1891727325026197801
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 43E37657DCEF3F16C27FE28790FFE9A49E1EBD67E945F7EF8E5B04B669BD5610
  • createdAtMillis - 1739881899422
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 189172732502619780143E37657DCEF3F16C27FE28790FFE9A49E1EBD67E945F7EF8E5B04B669BD5610