Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-17 18:09:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C34E9E86B41DBF24AE8BD8BA56E8E21D64B6D4237FBB2593674159ACD27EDE3F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Scientific American did post about the dangers of 5G. This noter is abusing CN and OP. This is the fifth incorrect CN from this noter on this OP in the last week. https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1891536223493312755
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C34E9E86B41DBF24AE8BD8BA56E8E21D64B6D4237FBB2593674159ACD27EDE3F
  • createdAtMillis - 1739815748277
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1891536223493312755C34E9E86B41DBF24AE8BD8BA56E8E21D64B6D4237FBB2593674159ACD27EDE3F