Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-18 00:35:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2FFB8EEA24DBFF7482D6AB4FC8839E371ED158A232C1361D20399F1699353691
Participant Details

Original Note:

Scientific American did post about the dangers of 5G. This noter is abusing CN and OP. This is the fifth incorrect CN from this noter on this OP in the last week. https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1891536223493312755
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2FFB8EEA24DBFF7482D6AB4FC8839E371ED158A232C1361D20399F1699353691
  • createdAtMillis - 1739838952867
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18915362234933127552FFB8EEA24DBFF7482D6AB4FC8839E371ED158A232C1361D20399F1699353691