Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-17 13:32:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 876F8192AFEE621E0D5C2D6566434D0A3712903F803723373B0464CE23107E28
Participant Details

Original Note:

COBOL being the language used to manage social security data bases does not explain the range of ages seen here as all null field would default to the exact same age, not the range of ages seen here. https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/31288/does-or-did-cobol-default-to-1875-05-20-for-corrupt-or-missing-dates

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1891453806430372046
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 876F8192AFEE621E0D5C2D6566434D0A3712903F803723373B0464CE23107E28
  • createdAtMillis - 1739799141712
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1891453806430372046876F8192AFEE621E0D5C2D6566434D0A3712903F803723373B0464CE23107E28