Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-17 12:06:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 63D2F2CC0059FC6C1C6B01095AAE37FBBB9EA6CB4A6B8190F0BC8F98FB32F994
Participant Details

Original Note:

COBOL being the language used to manage social security data bases does not explain the range of ages seen here as all null field would default to the exact same age, not the range of ages seen here. https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/31288/does-or-did-cobol-default-to-1875-05-20-for-corrupt-or-missing-dates

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1891453806430372046
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 63D2F2CC0059FC6C1C6B01095AAE37FBBB9EA6CB4A6B8190F0BC8F98FB32F994
  • createdAtMillis - 1739794010628
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 189145380643037204663D2F2CC0059FC6C1C6B01095AAE37FBBB9EA6CB4A6B8190F0BC8F98FB32F994