Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-17 17:04:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F954611764F9E32FB2F9BB9544EBB9330F1DFE2840AC72C37C109D5F7A4883B
Participant Details

Original Note:

COBOL being the language used to manage social security data bases does not explain the range of ages seen here as all null field would default to the exact same age, not the range of ages seen here. https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/31288/does-or-did-cobol-default-to-1875-05-20-for-corrupt-or-missing-dates

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1891453806430372046
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F954611764F9E32FB2F9BB9544EBB9330F1DFE2840AC72C37C109D5F7A4883B
  • createdAtMillis - 1739811877438
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18914538064303720464F954611764F9E32FB2F9BB9544EBB9330F1DFE2840AC72C37C109D5F7A4883B