Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-17 13:07:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0CF4D082ABB646D29BA4976053A7488257B59BF0B847C64B2E91E152E4704830
Participant Details

Original Note:

COBOL being the language used to manage social security data bases does not explain the range of ages seen here as all null field would default to the exact same age, not the range of ages seen here. https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/31288/does-or-did-cobol-default-to-1875-05-20-for-corrupt-or-missing-dates

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1891453806430372046
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0CF4D082ABB646D29BA4976053A7488257B59BF0B847C64B2E91E152E4704830
  • createdAtMillis - 1739797639924
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18914538064303720460CF4D082ABB646D29BA4976053A7488257B59BF0B847C64B2E91E152E4704830