Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-17 09:06:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 657C07A13FBAA19905E55B88DFDF112B9BB73CD98F30DBD662FE229538E14446
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence about something that happened as described in the post. There were three witnesses and there is not a person with acid in her eyes and what the OP is stating. This post is misleading trying to trigger an emotional reaction. https://offenders.org.uk/offender?id=5296

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1891229726678675476
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 657C07A13FBAA19905E55B88DFDF112B9BB73CD98F30DBD662FE229538E14446
  • createdAtMillis - 1739783167918
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1891229726678675476657C07A13FBAA19905E55B88DFDF112B9BB73CD98F30DBD662FE229538E14446