Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-15 00:32:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4ABE6203F10279A89C2A3C09E70B746A68D327698E0FC5F06B79365FFE86469B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the proposed note doesn't disprove that this is an actual internal memo, as the sources provided are external communications. This could or could not be satire, but we should have hard facts before we CN this post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1890466309793804641
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4ABE6203F10279A89C2A3C09E70B746A68D327698E0FC5F06B79365FFE86469B
  • createdAtMillis - 1739579554574
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18904663097938046414ABE6203F10279A89C2A3C09E70B746A68D327698E0FC5F06B79365FFE86469B