Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-14 16:35:27 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC5D5930FB6C30D6EAF28B351A08D71CB9432B5C7DB1CCFB65BD482685844D30
Participant Details

Original Note:

Second point made by the author <<2. Practice of Sati is almost non existent>> obviously cannot be inferred from this purported screenshot nor from the rest of the "Regulation XVII, A. D. 1829 of the Bengal Code". The Regulations Of The Bengal Code by Field, C. D.(1875) https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.110208/page/n835/mode/1up

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1890421464739795380
participantId -
raterParticipantId - EC5D5930FB6C30D6EAF28B351A08D71CB9432B5C7DB1CCFB65BD482685844D30
createdAtMillis - 1739550927956
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1890421464739795380EC5D5930FB6C30D6EAF28B351A08D71CB9432B5C7DB1CCFB65BD482685844D30