Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-13 23:16:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 805F668E0480C545B6147DBA7DE9F7D3CFA46E4131561E11B15FA6E9DBA71E1C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Authors of the study refute these claims. 1. Objective findings in people experiencing PEM differed fundamentally from those caused by deconditioning. 2. Matched healthy controls did not experience PEM. They also refute the interpretation of PEM having a psychological basis. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56431-7

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1889976436112691318
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 805F668E0480C545B6147DBA7DE9F7D3CFA46E4131561E11B15FA6E9DBA71E1C
  • createdAtMillis - 1739488595838
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1889976436112691318805F668E0480C545B6147DBA7DE9F7D3CFA46E4131561E11B15FA6E9DBA71E1C