Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-14 08:49:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 808DE95DB8CFC1A982930A465D3532A6FE9FF852B9E4696694F88169E86A598C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The original post's claims are accurate. The post does not claim that the judge was making rulings specifically on USAID; only that his wife's NGO is a beneficiary of USAID funds which is also under scrutiny from the same administration.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1889723083247985114
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 808DE95DB8CFC1A982930A465D3532A6FE9FF852B9E4696694F88169E86A598C
  • createdAtMillis - 1739522951857
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1889723083247985114808DE95DB8CFC1A982930A465D3532A6FE9FF852B9E4696694F88169E86A598C