Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-14 15:34:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3337EF75BDD809AD6BD439C7CC078DBD48D7FDA3B72607CD1D46E10A7D65AB88
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The original post's claims are accurate. The post does not claim that the judge was making rulings specifically on USAID; only that his wife's NGO is a beneficiary of USAID funds which is also under scrutiny from the same administration.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1889723083247985114
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3337EF75BDD809AD6BD439C7CC078DBD48D7FDA3B72607CD1D46E10A7D65AB88
  • createdAtMillis - 1739547286555
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18897230832479851143337EF75BDD809AD6BD439C7CC078DBD48D7FDA3B72607CD1D46E10A7D65AB88