Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-13 23:16:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 805F668E0480C545B6147DBA7DE9F7D3CFA46E4131561E11B15FA6E9DBA71E1C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The authors replied to this criticism and clearly stated why this is wrong. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-56431-7

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1889713636630794392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 805F668E0480C545B6147DBA7DE9F7D3CFA46E4131561E11B15FA6E9DBA71E1C
  • createdAtMillis - 1739488589003
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1889713636630794392805F668E0480C545B6147DBA7DE9F7D3CFA46E4131561E11B15FA6E9DBA71E1C