Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-13 05:32:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3769F40E7CB59C70C23C126F221EB5E0A9E454055F3C4985B65A03A3410BD6EA
Participant Details

Original Note:

l’étude présentée par Libération est loin d’être concluante puisqu’elle tire une régression linéaire à partir d’une nuage de points extrêmement dispersés https://x.com/sonic_urticant/status/1889629323297960256?s=46&t=vI4POfaXQCYZOyYI7wtMfg

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1889700495604011433
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3769F40E7CB59C70C23C126F221EB5E0A9E454055F3C4985B65A03A3410BD6EA
  • createdAtMillis - 1739424770990
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18897004956040114333769F40E7CB59C70C23C126F221EB5E0A9E454055F3C4985B65A03A3410BD6EA