Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-12 17:01:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 63AF37FF0D3546F53685B1D038C3F3527165A1AA2A3D2D258E730E154ADAF40E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - L'étude se base sur une moyenne d'un indicateur de véracité sur les tweets. - Chaque parti critique la désinformation - Cette critique est une petite part des tweets Sans étude subsidiaire, on peut supposer que le cas énoncé dans la note est marginal, et sans impact. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/19401612241311886#supplementary-materials

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1889655277009371442
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 63AF37FF0D3546F53685B1D038C3F3527165A1AA2A3D2D258E730E154ADAF40E
  • createdAtMillis - 1739379683997
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188965527700937144263AF37FF0D3546F53685B1D038C3F3527165A1AA2A3D2D258E730E154ADAF40E