Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-12 13:28:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 853F6CB3DB8E6B8258D5BBDA1D1B71888C85CB90278D6B9DC054E6C33DD10F48
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'étude se base sur la véracité des liens internet envoyés à partir de 32m de tweet récupérés de tout partis politiques. Ainsi, une personne partageant un article contenant des fausses informations pour en critiquer le contenu est compté comme utilisant des fakes news. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/19401612241311886#supplementary-materials

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1889643808058421377
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 853F6CB3DB8E6B8258D5BBDA1D1B71888C85CB90278D6B9DC054E6C33DD10F48
  • createdAtMillis - 1739366884853
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1889643808058421377853F6CB3DB8E6B8258D5BBDA1D1B71888C85CB90278D6B9DC054E6C33DD10F48