Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-12 17:01:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 63AF37FF0D3546F53685B1D038C3F3527165A1AA2A3D2D258E730E154ADAF40E
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'étude se base sur la véracité des liens internet envoyés à partir de 32m de tweet récupérés de tout partis politiques. Ainsi, une personne partageant un article contenant des fausses informations pour en critiquer le contenu est compté comme utilisant des fakes news. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/19401612241311886#supplementary-materials

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1889643808058421377
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 63AF37FF0D3546F53685B1D038C3F3527165A1AA2A3D2D258E730E154ADAF40E
  • createdAtMillis - 1739379699678
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 188964380805842137763AF37FF0D3546F53685B1D038C3F3527165A1AA2A3D2D258E730E154ADAF40E