Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-12 20:13:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BDC069E62A078C207A4916FE6F254DBF43867A1F3739EF64690DE93B29EF7C0B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The use of the incorrect Ukraine Family Scheme form is completely immaterial to the tribunal's decision. The Home Office chose not to challenge the appeal on that basis. This was a claim based on human rights, which the tribunal concluded to be "a very strong claim indeed". https://tribunalsdecisions.service.gov.uk/utiac/ui-2024-005295-ors

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1889476175145078813
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BDC069E62A078C207A4916FE6F254DBF43867A1F3739EF64690DE93B29EF7C0B
  • createdAtMillis - 1739391200154
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1889476175145078813BDC069E62A078C207A4916FE6F254DBF43867A1F3739EF64690DE93B29EF7C0B